MONTY / PLAY
Will AI make us less intelligent or more intelligent?
AI illustrationThe player connects to YouTube only after your click and may share technical data with Google. This choice is separate from AskMonty analytics. How it works
If this video cannot play here, use the YouTube link.
BEFORE YOU PRESS PLAY
What is discussed
AskMonty AI editorial noteSource consulted:
Researching padel rackets can make someone feel they know the sport; without the tool, however, Montemagno admits he knows very little about it. He uses this example to describe the illusion of knowledge he associates with passive AI use. He adds two other risks: reading a solution without understanding it and losing skills that are no longer practised. His account of a programmer friend also shows the benefit he sees in AI when the person using it has experience and keeps checking the results.
Key points
- In his padel example, having answers at hand does not mean having learned them.
- In chess, he distinguishes studying a position from reading the move suggested by an engine.
- He cites his own difficulty with handwriting as an example of a neglected skill and urges people to keep thinking and practising while using AI.
AI summary based on material from the linked source.
3glossary expressions documented here
Each expression counts once per item, even when repeated. The overall ranking covers the reviewed portion of the archive.
Open a symbol to discover its meaning. Checked against the source material. View source


